Who owns electronic voting machines

It is also important to clarify the difference between direct ownership of Dominion as claimed by Mr Trump, and donations made by the company either for philanthropic or lobbying purposes. Dominion has made donations to both Republican and Democratic interests, but it's not uncommon for a company such as this to lobby for government contracts in this way. Dominion Voting has released a statement saying it is a non-partisan US company and has no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family or the Clinton Global Initiative.

The Clinton Foundation has also issued a statement saying it "has never had any stake in Dominion Voting Systems; we have never been involved in the company's operations; and we can confirm that we are not currently working together". Dominion did however donate to the Clinton Foundation in , and made a philanthropic commitment to the foundation to donate election technology to poorer countries.

The rumours about Ms Pelosi stem from her former chief of staff, Nadeam Elshami, being hired by Dominion - but it has also hired staff previously associated with the Republican party. The accusations of involvement with Dominion have also extended to members of President-elect Biden's transition team. Posts on social media claim Peter Neffenger, who is a volunteer for Mr Biden's team, is chairman of a subsidiary of Dominion, Smartmatic.

Mr Neffenger is chairman of Smartmatic - but it's a competitor - not a subsidiary - of Dominion. Verdict: It's true that Texas did not provide certification for the machines. Their approach is different to other states. The US federal government provides guidelines for certifying voting machines - which is meant to produce a common standard across the country. However, Texas has stipulated additional requirements , which the Dominion machines are unable to satisfy, such as that each ballot has a unique number so it can be traced.

Artificial intelligence does not come to us as a deus ex machina but, rather, through a number of dehumanizing extractive practices, of which most of us are unaware. She is a Scholar in Residence at Middlebury. October Read Next. Submit a letter: Email us letters nybooks. This Issue November 19, Valeria Luiselli. Things as They Are. Pankaj Mishra. Grand Illusions of the West.

Nathan Whitlock. News about upcoming issues, contributors, special events, online features, and more. The New York Review of Books: recent articles and content from nybooks.

I consent to having NYR add my email to their mailing list. In Georgia, for example, election security expert J. Almost all of the legal challenges casting doubt on the outcome of the election have been dismissed or withdrawn and many claims of fraud debunked. And Dominion has fought back forcefully, filing defamation lawsuits against high-profile Trump allies. For years, he said, concerns raised by election security experts were dismissed as unimportant.

David Cross is an attorney for plaintiffs in a long-running lawsuit filed by proponents of hand-marked paper ballots. He detailed his findings in a report filed under seal last month as part of the lawsuit, which challenges the election system Georgia bought in State officials have consistently argued that the Dominion machines have been thoroughly vetted and that security measures are in place to prevent problems.